 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Embracing innovation was key to the success of the Pocket House Project. Pocket Houses incorporate the following four innovative aspects reflected in the project design: housing “fit”, suite size, the promotion of dignity, and accessibility.
The first innovative characteristic of Pocket Houses was fitting a modern, multi-family dwelling onto an infill lot at a scale consistent with adjacent singlefamily housing. This immediately set the project apart from other conventional affordable housing developments since its design fit into the existing single family neighbourhood character while providing affordable high-density housing for single residents.
Secondly, at 230 sq. ft. per unit for a single person dwelling, the units supply all the basic housing necessities including a private bathroom, entrance, cooking area and bedroom while keeping maintenance, utility, and building costs down. There are no common areas in the building, thereby reducing both capital and operating costs.
Thirdly, Pocket Houses help to promote dignity and independence of the tenants through the provision of private
bathrooms and entranceways as well as
separate ventilation systems to prevent
sound and odour disturbances between
tenants. The lack of a shared hallway
or entrance corridor also cuts down on
noise and security issues.
Lastly, integrating accessibility into the
Pocket House design helped to make
the project functional for tenants with
mobility issues. All of the ground-floor
suites are barrier free and one unit in
every building is fully accessible for
wheelchairs or other mobility devices.
In addition, the accessibility of Pocket
Houses also extends to the broader
neighbourhood. Sites for the Pocket
Houses were selected so that tenants
would be in close proximity to bus stops,
laundromats and other basic community
services.
Similar to many projects based on
cutting edge design, the Pocket
Houses encountered a number
of challenges including finding
suitably sized lots and complying
with zoning regulations. Another
challenge involved designing a
multi-family building without
common space while complying
with the Winnipeg Housing
and Homeless Initiative’s
(WHHI) request for universally
accessible units.
Overcoming local resistance to
the Pocket Houses required a community
consultation process to help dispel fears
regarding the development of the Pocket
Houses. The two main local concerns
were the design of the units and the
future tenant groups. Local neighbours
were concerned that the Pocket Houses
on narrow lots would too closely
resemble mobile homes. Cohlmeyer Architects addressed this concern by
incorporating unique exterior features,
and offsetting the front and rear units.
Subsequently, S.A.M Management,
along with ND LEA, discussed measures
to help deal with local fears regarding
future tenants by offering to provide
tenant supports while ensuring an
appropriate mix of tenants who would
integrate well into the community. The
end result of the community consultation
process was community
support for
the project including consent for the
numerous zoning variance applications
that were needed for the project to
conform to City regulations. These
variances included side yard allowances,
increased densities and insufficient
parking.
A final challenge was the rising cost
of construction. Resourcefully, project
collaborators chose to take a long-term
outlook on the project in the face of financial difficulties. The implementation of different green technologies has
been seen as long-term benefit for
the project. Low-flush toilets, low-flow
shower heads, compact florescent lights,
paired hot water tanks, single piece
kitchen units, and effective separate
ventilation systems are only some of the
technologies featured in the buildings to
help lower costs on a long-term basis.
Innovation was key to overcoming the
challenges of a new planning model
while focusing on the quality of the end
product for both the tenants and the
surrounding communities. |
 |
| |
|
|
|
 |